Sundance Evaluation: Danny Philippou and Michael Philippou’s Supernatural Horror ‘Discuss To Me’

Kids shouldn’t play with useless issues: not simply the title of a low-budget American horror from 1972 however phrases to stay by, particularly on this unnerving and extremely efficient Midnight entry from Australia. However although it employs some acquainted tropes — high-schoolers dabble within the occult and shortly start to want they hadn’t, Danny Philippou and Michael Philippou’s movie Discuss to Me does try and do one thing new with an outdated concept, for one factor making the crossing of infernal thresholds seem to be an terrible lot of enjoyable.

From the beginning, essentially the most hanging factor is that there’s not a lot in the best way of a preamble and little or no lip service to style traditions. The Philippous are respectful sufficient of recent audiences to grasp that everyone is aware of now the place the ethical line is, so as an alternative of the standard setup — traditionally, a creepy, drunken outdated man yelling, “Avoid Camp Crystal Lake” — they begin with a micro-movie, wherein a youngster turns as much as a drunken celebration to search for his brother. The brother is having what appears to be a psychotic episode, and, to the horror of the opposite partygoers, stabs his brother within the chest and himself within the face. It’s brutal and fast, serving as an apt overture to the principle motion, however will later show extra necessary to the narrative than it first appears.

Instantly, the main target switches to 17-year-old Mia (Sophie Wilde), who continues to be wrestling together with her mom’s dying. Locked out emotionally by her father, Mia appears to her finest pal Jade (Alexandra Jensen) and her heat, affectionate household for help. The extra rebellious of the 2 ladies, Mia persuades Jade to affix her at a séance of types, the place a candle is lit, visitors take the embalmed, disembodied hand of a useless psychic (or is it a Satanist?) and say the phrases that give the movie its identify: “Discuss to me.” Footage of those occasions have been going viral for some time, sending contributors into glassy-eyed convulsions, so why do they proceed? As a result of the Philippous painting these possessions as a excessive, leaving Mia “glowing” fairly than freaked out after her first strive.

As in all teen-themed horrors, there’s an undercurrent of sexual stress right here, notably in the truth that Mia’s ex, Daniel, is now relationship Jade. However for these questioning the place these movies can go subsequent within the age of #MeToo, the Philippous have a reasonably good reply: the place the reactionary slashers of the ’70s and ’80s exploited their younger viewers’s urge for food for intercourse and successfully punished them for it, Discuss to Me is a considerate try to determine what actually frightens youngsters at this time. In Mia’s case, it’s her mom’s dying, which more and more appears like suicide, and her drift into the spirit world displays each her want for closure and her fears for the long run (in distinction to Mia’s full of life peer group, the apparitions she sees are rotting, blackened, and oozing goo from pustulant sores).

After an admirably well-ratcheted build-up, the rollercoaster lastly plunges when Jade’s little brother Riley (Joe Chicken) tags alongside to certainly one of these “possession events”, and all hell breaks unfastened in a fantastically gory eruption of violence that sees the 13-year-old smashing his face into each accessible floor. Within the mayhem that follows, sure guidelines of gate-keeping are forgotten — every session should final now not than 90 seconds, and the candle have to be extinguished instantly after — and it turns into more and more possible that the porous wall between the residing and the useless has been breached.

As is commonly the case with Australian horror, the filmmakers persist with their weapons all through, which signifies that, as an alternative of neatly wrapping issues up in a last-minute sell-out, the ending is admirably darkish (with echoes of the unique 1992 Candyman). There’s a sense, nevertheless, that this may increasingly probably not be the top. In spite of everything, we solely see one embalmed hand, and, as one character sagely notes, “The opposite one’s on the market… someplace.”


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *