B.C. firm denies deceptive First Nation about rail terminal growth plans

The proprietor of a rail terminal in British Columbia’s Inside says a lawsuit launched by the Bonaparte First Nation is a “collateral assault” on the corporate’s “quite a few” grants, permits, and licenses to function the increasing facility.

The nation’s declare filed final month alleges the ability operated by Ashcroft Terminal Ltd. has been developed with out correct session, whereas unearthing and disturbing human stays on the nation’s ancestral territory.

The Bonaparte First Nation alleges it was misled in regards to the full scope of the terminal’s growth plans, “adamantly” denying ever receiving the complete build-out particulars, the nation’s lawyer Jason Gratl stated.

In its response filed in British Columbia Supreme Court docket earlier this month, the corporate denies deceptive Bonaparte, saying it “extensively engaged” the nation over its growth plans in addition to “archeological problems with concern.”

The terminal companies railway site visitors on a 130-hectare property on the intersection of observe networks owned by CP Rail and CN Rail, a “strategic” location that accommodates a tank farm, container storage, and different infrastructure,the response says.

The property about 300 kilometres northeast of Vancouver has had varied house owners because the mid-1860s, the corporate says, claiming in its response that the First Nation has by no means challenged any authorized authorization allowing the ability’s growth in practically twenty years.

The terminal’s growth has been dependent upon buyer demand and capability necessities, constructing out as wanted over time since 2005, it says.

“That’s the nature of such an inland port terminal,“ the response states. ”Because the Ashcroft Terminal acquires prospects, and by extension the capability calls for of these prospects enhance, corresponding growth of Ashcroft Terminal ensues. Shopper demand dictates the scope of the Ashcroft Terminal.“

The First Nation’s declare says the location was house to a historic village courting again 1000’s of years, a spot of non secular and cultural significance with “quite a few” burials.

Improvement on the property has unearthed human stays and vital gadgets, with dozens of archeologists spending 1000’s of hours on the website, court docket paperwork say.

Ashcroft Terminal says archeologists employed by the corporate had labored alongside these affiliated with the First Nation for years, however the relationship took a flip in June 2021, when protesters staged a starvation strike on the property.

The protesters from Bonaparte needed to carry a blessing ceremony after human stays had been found on the location, the corporate’s response says.

Firm representatives and the First Nation agreed on a reburial plan, and took part in a “unity horse experience” the next day, it says.

Ashcroft Terminal claims it hasn’t handled any human stays discovered on the location with out the nation’s enter.

The corporate and the band additionally started months of negotiations to formalize the phrases of a “long-term relationship settlement,” however Ashcroft Terminal says the First Nation stopped responding when the corporate shared a draft settlement final November.

The corporate denies Bonaparte’s claims of Aboriginal rights and title over the terminal property and says the event work is lawful and correctly disclosed.

Ashcroft Terminal’s response additionally disputes Bonaparte’s claims beneath the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which compels signatory states to “search to allow the entry and/or repatriation of ceremonial objects and human stays of their possession by means of honest, clear and efficient mechanisms developed along with Indigenous Peoples involved.”

The corporate’s response denies that the UN declaration and associated laws in B.C. “kind the premise of any reason for motion or declare identified to the legislation.”

The B.C. legislature unanimously handed laws in November 2019 to align the province’s legal guidelines with the declaration.

The Bonaparte lawsuit seeks unspecified damages, a number of declarations, and an injunction to halt development and growth exercise on the location.

Not one of the allegations have been examined in court docket, and no hearings have been set because the First Nation awaits responses from the B.C. and federal governments, that are additionally named as defendants within the swimsuit, Bonaparte’s lawyer stated Friday.

This report by The Canadian Press was first printed Could 22, 2023.


Conversations are opinions of our readers and are topic to the Code of Conduct. The Star doesn’t endorse these opinions.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *